After
the nearly 30 years companion, confidant and aide of Chief Minister Jayalalitha,
Sasikala and her relatives were suddenly subjected to expulsion from her Poes
Garden residence and ADMK, there is a spurt in the complaints against them to
the police; the complaints relate to crores of rupees of corruption, extortion,
cheating etc., The police take actions on those complaints in lightning speed
and also resort to arrests. Police take action on the complaints, register
cases, and immediately arrest the concerned.
v Are proper investigations carried out on
those complaints?
v Were investigations completed just in a
day?
v If they were arrested on the very next
day of receiving complaints, is there any ulterior motive?
v Was there any reason for the arrest of
Sasikala’s husband M.Natarajan all of a sudden on the day Sasikala came to the
Bangalore Special Court for her deposition in the Disproportionate Assets case?
v Is it only because of his arrest that
Sasikala accepted in the court that Jayalalitha had no role in the case?
v Was Sasikala threatened to depose like
that or else her husband would be arrested?
v Was it only because she refused to
depose like that in the court that the complaint against Natarajan itself was
obtained in haste? What is happening in the State?
v Is the law and order situation in the
state is such that anyone can give complaints against anybody and the very next
day the person can be arrested and lodged in jails?
v Were not all those who arrested now, were
under the custody and protection of the Chief Minister for the past several
years, particularly during the last nine months?
v If people very close to the Chief
Minister had committed offences during the last nine months, was this regime
passively witnessing all those things?
v Did not the government’s intelligence
wing found out all these things and taken to the notice of the Chief Minister?
v Is it true that on realising before hand
that punishment is imminent in the on-going Disproportionate Assets Case trial
nearing completion, that this regime is making efforts to make some others as
scapegoats to escape punishment? Or not?
v Is punishment only for those who commit
offences? Or is it applicable to those
aid and abet?
v Who were abetting them to muster courage
to commit offences?
v Having for years joining with them and
committing offences after offences, and now trying to escape making only them
as scapegoats; is it (legally) acceptable?
v When those who were in connivance for
the offences are now giving confessions, should not action be taken against
those who incited, aided and abetted the offence?
v Many have given complaints of having
given crores of rupees as bribe for getting so many works done. Where did the
money go? Who is responsible for it?
v When confessions for buying properties
worth several crore are coming forth, what are the actions against those who
acquired those properties? Where from
did they get money to buy them? What were all the irregularities committed in
return for those moneys?
v In her deposition before the court, Sasikala
is reported to have conceded that the purchase of TANSI land was true, and that
the then Managing Director of TANSI, Srinivasan, on his own, came forward and
offered 55 ground land to Jaya Publications. The then TANSI Managing Director
Srinivasan was a senior IAS officer. How can he come forward on his own and
offer 55 ground government land to Jaya Pubications? Will an IAS officer do like this without the
Chief Minister asking him to do so?
v The TANSI land case went upto the
Supreme Court and the SC judges themselves in the verdict ordered for the
return of the land to the government. Can anybody make a Chief Minister as a
dormant partner and indulge in all acts desired by them?
What
are the answers of the ADMK regime for all these? r
No comments:
Post a Comment